|
|
Skateboarding Law (490 Posts)
|
Topic |
Info |
first run-in
|
On 4/10/2006
amos
wrote in from
United States
(72.18.nnn.nnn)
so i had my first run in with the law the other day. skating to my truck from my buddies dorm. 2am-ish. The street i had to cross has a cross street that doesn't directly cross. it's kinda caddy-cornerish. so i check and everything's clear (i knew that there was a cop behind me, but no one else was around) so i skated out onto the street, went down maybe 50yds, and turned into a parking lot. the cop followed me, so i knew he was gonna say something. right as i was about to go down the sidewalk that goes through campus (where he wouldn't be able to get me) the guy flashes his lights. i stopped, and he was real nice, just like "the bars just let out, this prolly isn't the best time to do a move like that." I bs'd at him, but I've had more than a few close calls, and nothing was gonna happen.
o well, just be nice to the cops or else their mean to you.
|
|
|
|
hi
|
On 3/31/2006 the awesome
wrote in from
United States
(205.155.nnn.nnn)
hi
|
|
|
|
Your school project
|
On 3/28/2006
Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
Yes: Skateboarding should be prohibited in some public places. This should include (but not be limited to): Tennis courts. Public swimming pools. Freeways. Airport runways. Indoor hallways and offices. Wheelchair ramps. Etc
Like most minor crimes, officers are allowed to use non-deadly force to arrest you. They are not allowed to deliberately destroy your property. Security guards, having less training, are more LIKELY (but perhaps still not allowed by law) to use serious or deadly force. See your state laws on "use of deadly force" or "citizens arrest".
You are taking a serious risk when dealing with security guards, some of whom are attracted to the job because of the power, and like to use it. (My drunk brother-in-law was shot 4 times by a security guard ... It helped him stop his drinking problem, but it also could have killed him.)
You should be able to look up your own state laws on this. Try "google" using keywords like: "trespass" "deadly force" "citizens arrest" "state (list state)" "apprehend"
-- Pat
|
|
|
|
Should Skateboarding be illegallized in Public Places
|
On 3/28/2006 Cody
wrote in from
United States
(66.5.nnn.nnn)
Do you think Skateboarding be illegallized in Public Places? And does anyone know the limits on what a security guard and/or police officer can do when stoping you from Skateboarding in a restricted area? (for example, can a security guard and/or police officer break your board when stoping you from skateboarding where it is not allowed?) Please get respond to this AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, it is for a school report.
|
|
|
|
General overview of skateboard laws
|
On 3/25/2006 OldStoke
wrote in from
United States
(12.75.nnn.nnn)
Is there a website that gives the basic skateboard laws for each state? I know that cities can have their own tougher laws, but is there an easy way to get the basics of the minimum requirement for each state?
|
|
|
|
redondo outlaw??
|
On 3/24/2006
peters
wrote in from
United States
(24.18.nnn.nnn)
wow Pat, guess I was a bonafide criminal at 9 years old!!! hope I wasn't part of the reason for that law at the time ;-) Redondo's my birthplace, and skated the Strand plus just about every alleyway around there with my nephew Mikey circa '76--'80 (easy to be an uncle at the age of ONE when you've got sibs 20 yrs older...)
|
|
|
|
California Skateboard Law
|
On 3/24/2006
Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
No definition of "skateboard" was found.
Three sections of the law apply:
Click here for link Section 115800: Rules for skateboard parks, limits of liability, etc.
Click here for link Section 21212 : Helmet law for skateboarding.
Click here for link Section 21968 21969 Allows local (city, county) to restrict skateboarding, prohibits motorized skateboarding on roadways.
No definition of "skateboard" was found.
|
|
|
|
Redondo Beach skateboard law
|
On 3/24/2006
pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
You are totally out of luck. Redondo Beach has the MOST restrictive laws I've ever seen for skateboarding. You need to work with your city officials and get these changed. I could not find a definition of a "skateboard" in the law.
Click here for link
12-2.07 Bicycle and skateboard riding. Bicycle and skateboard riding is prohibited on any portion of any pier, wharf, public area, parking structure, or City-owned property where posted, except as may be otherwise provided for in this Code. (§ 6, Ord. 2192 c.s., eff. April 6, 1977, as amended by § 1, Ord. 2749 c.s., eff. September 14, 1995, and § 1, Ord. 2815 c.s., eff. April 23, 1998)
3-1.03 Prohibited bicycle, skateboard, and roller skate riding on certain sidewalks, ramps, and parking structure areas. Wherever it is determined by the Council that the riding of bicycles, skateboards, or roller skates on any sidewalk, ramp, or parking structure area within the City creates a hazard to the public, the Council by resolution, may prohibit such bicycle, skateboard, and roller skate riding at specific location by directing the installation of proper signs and notices deemed necessary to properly inform the public of such restrictions. (§ 1, Ord. 2213 c.s., eff. September 14, 1977, as amended by § 1, Ord. 2748 c.s., eff. September 14, 1995)
3-1.04 Riding on sidewalks prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle, skateboard, or roller skates on any sidewalk properly posted or signed prohibiting such riding. (§ 1, Ord. 2213 c.s., eff. September 14, 1977)
3-1.07 Skateboards, roller skates, and wheeled toys prohibited on bicycle paths. No person shall use, operate, or leave any skateboard, roller skates, wheeled toy, or device upon any designated bicycle path within the City. (§ 1, Ord. 2213 c.s., eff. September 14, 1977)
3-1.06 Skateboards, roller skates, and wheeled toys prohibited on streets and alleys. No person shall use, operate, park, or leave any skateboard, roller skates, or wheeled toy upon the traveled way of any public street or alley. Any device used in violation of the provisions of this section may be impounded by the Police Department and returned to the owner under such reasonable conditions as may be established by the Chief of Police. (§ 1, Ord. 2213 c.s., eff. September 14, 1977)
4-9.802 Prohibited activities. (a) Dogs. Dogs with or without a leash are hereby prohibited on any portion of the area described in this article. Any person permitting a dog to be in said area with or without a leash shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
(b) Bicycles. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle within the area described in this article; provided, however, bicycle riding shall be permitted on any portion of said area designated as a bicycle path.
(c) Skateboards. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride or propel any skateboard or similar device (including roller skates) along, across, upon, or within the area described in this article. [NOTE: Fisherman's Wharf area]
|
|
|
|
legal definition of a skateboard
|
On 3/23/2006
Ben
wrote in from
United States
(24.130.nnn.nnn)
Can anyone post the legal definition of a skateboard in the state of california (more specificly redondo beach). My lil bro got a ticket and i want to see what the state of california conciders a skateboard to be
|
|
|
|
security guards and cops
|
On 3/13/2006
joey
wrote in from
United States
(70.56.nnn.nnn)
i was skateboarding one day at this really nice spot i had just found and a security guard pulled up in a golf cart and started freaking out on me! i knew there were signs that said no skateboarding so i was going to leave when he asked me to. no argument. my friend was recording this on my video camera when it happend. the guard came running up to me saying that he was going to have me arrested and stuff like that. i stood there and listend to what he was saying and i was trying to be polite and everything. he tells me i have to leave and i say ok. but then for no reason he starts threataning me! i have no idea why? i know that you probubly think that im just some kid who wants people to feel sorry for him but this is all true and im not leaving anything out either. he says to my friend who was recording it that he has going to "take that camera and shove it up my butt" i told him that we were leaving and he didnt have to say that. he says "you heard what i said! and some other stuff that i dont really remember becasue i was so shocked that he said that. was it a crime to video tape him? yes i have this all uploaded on the internet if you would like to see it. if you listen to the audio from the tape the last thing he said is "your lucky i dont go over there and break that camera" it wasent even really obvious that he was video taping him.. he was pretty much just holding the camera not even pointing it at him. but anyways i think skateboarders deserve to be treated a little better. i was so polite to him and i didnt really get much of it back.
on an unrelated subject.. if you want to skate a spot then DO NOT HOP A FENCE OR GO THROUGH A GATE TO GET TO IT!!!!!!!!!! trust me.. i got arrested for 2 counts of criminal trespassing and i have to go to court for it on april 4th. i bet that will look great on a job application or when i try to get into college! anyways i hope i dont get fined or get community service or anything
:(
|
|
|
|
California helmet law.
|
On 3/12/2006
Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
El Cajon law regarding prohibitions on skateboarding in certain areas and for skateboarding in the park are located here:
http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/codes/elcajon/_DATA/TITLE09/Chapter_9_42__BICYCLING__ROLLER_SK/index.html
There are prohibited areas including the "Expanded Civic Center", and any private property (parking lot) with a posted sign. No helmet law except for the skateboard park...
===================================
California state law 21212. (a) A person under 18 years of age shall not operate a bicycle, a nonmotorized scooter, or a skateboard, nor shall they wear in-line or roller skates, nor ride upon a bicycle, a nonmotorized scooter, or a skateboard as a passenger, upon a street, bikeway, as defined in Section 890.4 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other public bicycle path or trail unless that person is wearing a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet that meets the standards of either the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), or standards subsequently established by those entities. This requirement also applies to a person who rides upon a bicycle while in a restraining seat that is attached to the bicycle or in a trailer towed by the bicycle.
Any charge under this subdivision shall be dismissed when the person charged alleges in court, under oath, that the charge against the person is the first charge against that person under this subdivision, unless it is otherwise established in court that the charge is not the first charge against the person.
=============================
So you need to go to court, allege that this is your first offense, and it will be automatically dropped (unless it is NOT your first offense). Then go out and buy a helmet!
|
|
|
|
No-helmet bust
|
On 3/12/2006
Billy Cash
wrote in from
United States
(68.105.nnn.nnn)
The state I live in is California. The county is San Diego. The city is El Cajon. I don't know what citation is but I think u mean what section the crime is if thats what u want. It is 21212 or something like that and it says not wearing a helmet. I looked up the law on it and I can't find anything on the helmet law for San Diego, if u can and let me know with another post that would be great. Sincerly Billy
|
|
|
|
No-helmet bust
|
On 3/12/2006
Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
Many areas have helmet laws for riders under 16yrs old (bicycle and skateboard).
I understand that usually the ticket asks you to appear in court. If you and your parents do the appropriate "it won't happen again sir" dance, then there will be no fine.
They are trying to scare you into wearing a helmet. I hope it works because even a small fall can seriously injure you.
Can you tell us more about where this happened (city, county, state), what the ticket says the citation is for? It helps us look up the exact law.
Every driver knows that the best time to speed without getting caught is when the police are already writing up someone else for a ticket. When you were getting your ticket, the bicycle rider was in no danger of being cited. The cops won't stop writing your ticket to attend to something else unless it is a very serious event (crash w/injury, bank robbery, etc).
--Pat
|
|
|
|
Cop busted me
|
On 3/12/2006
Billy Cash
wrote in from
United States
(68.105.nnn.nnn)
My name is Billy and I am 16. A week ago I Was skating with my friends and we were going down the street when we get into a store we come out of the store and we are skating in a parking lot when all of a sudden a cop pulls up. He asks us why we wern't wearing helmets and why we were skating on a no skate section. I told him that there was no sign. He asks for my information and I give it to him. My friends did to. I havn't called them to see if they got the ticket too. While he was writing our info my friend says look there is a biclclist not wearing a helmet why isn't he getting a ticket. And the cop egnors my friend and keeps writing the info down. And he didn't get a ticket for riding his bike. So today i get in the mail the ticket and It has no price I have to pay, but it says I got to go to court. Ok in my area no one ever gets tickets for not wearing helmets unless a cop is bord. And this pisses me off real much because 1 I see cops all the time and they never bust me for not wearing a helmet 2 I don't look good in a suit and I don't like being in a boring court room. Now I think that skaters get alot of disrespect. We are just out there trying to have fun and its not like if I fall and hurt my self I am going to sue the city becuase it is my own fault.
|
|
|
|
cops suck
|
On 3/8/2006 garage racer
wrote in from
United States
(71.14.nnn.nnn)
a cop chased after me at the SMU garage on a sunday (no school= no cars) i stoped to ask should i leave ? he pulled his mace out!!!! i said whoa buddy!! he told me to take it easy!!! i was like this is BS and hauled ass outta there i heard him radio a fellow guy say we have stoner on his skateboard tell him to beat it. rediculous
|
|
|
|
Skate
|
On 3/7/2006 Aaron
wrote in from
United States
(204.38.nnn.nnn)
Just skate ...... i do it whether its legal or not if they come to kick me out i leave and come back 10 minutes later w/ a new board in hand. ("you didnt tell me i couldnt skate this board here") anyways i like what your doing here use my words as wisome
|
|
|
|
contraverisial issue paper
|
On 2/14/2006
Thompson
wrote in from
United States
(207.200.nnn.nnn)
hey guys, the name is thompson. im a freshman at poway high and was wondering if you guys could help me with some stuff...
im in an honors english class and was assigned a contreversial issue paper. i had to choose what to write about and chose skateoard laws...
i also need a few people to interview...you can email, im (tozteen) or myspace me (www.myspace.com?hawtyoverheremkkk)
|
|
|
|
...
|
On 2/3/2006 Ghooste
wrote in from
United Kingdom
(193.113.nnn.nnn)
I dont know how you guys cope, its gotta be the most infuriating situation. Feel for you dudes, hope you find a way round. Its the damn suing culture. Loss of earnings and med bills fair enough but money to make you feel better? How does a few grand make it better that you broke your arm? I mean yeah everyone likes to have some more money but does it effect the broken arm that you have a new tv an your tax bills paid up? No. That, I believe, is the crux of the issue, compensation culture.
|
|
|
|
re: "Hazardous Activity" = free from liability?
|
On 1/17/2006
msk
wrote in from
United States
(68.190.nnn.nnn)
"how, then, do they get away with having public skateparks open dawn-to-dusk with no adult supervision?
All public skateparks I know of in CA and MA operate in such a manner"
Actually, several California parks, especially some of the bigger/better parks like Glendale, Laguna Niguel, Santa Monica, and Etnies/Lake Forest, are staffed.
The California state law that designates skateboarding as a hazardous activity is conditional. In order to be free from liability, the city must either have a staff enforcing a pads/helmet rule, or in the case of an unstaffed park, pass a city ordinance requiring pads and a helmet in the park.
|
|
|
|
"Hazardous Activity"=free from liability?
|
On 1/11/2006 Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(15.252.nnn.nnn)
Here's some reasons that some cities could have less restrictions on skate parks than others:
State law is more "protective" of the cities. Historical precendent in that state favors the defendant (the city) than to the plaintif (the injured skater). The particular city "risk manager" is more or less inclined to accept risk. The city has been sued in the past and has lost, is running out of money, etc. The community insists on a skatepark and is willing to pay for good insurance without restrictions.
Etc, etc, etc.....
|
|
|
|
"Hazardous Activity"=free from liability?
|
On 1/11/2006
Lansing
wrote in from
United States
(70.146.nnn.nnn)
Thanks, Pat -- Very informative...though not exactly encouraging.
I guess my question would be this: Unless the statutes in other states are more explicit about the situation regarding minors, how, then, do they get away with having public skateparks open dawn-to-dusk with no adult supervision?
All public skateparks I know of in CA and MA operate in such a manner, and it seems to me that if an underage skater got injured and the city/county/state was at ALL liable for the acts of minors because they cannot assume the risk (not being adults), there would have been dozens of lawsuits by now and parks would be closing like mad. But to the contrary, it seems that every little village and hamlet in CA, AZ, OR, and WA is building a public skatepark -- many with big ol' tranny and 10-step stairs, etc.
Is it simply that CA, MA and other state statutes declaring skateboarding a "hazardous activity" explicity address this issue, and specify clearly that minors also "assume the risk" themselves? But if a minor cannot assume such a risk in FL, then how would that free cities in other states simply by having it in writing in the statute?
Lansing
|
|
|
|
miami cops
|
On 1/11/2006 dirty dan
wrote in from
United States
(64.80.nnn.nnn)
I was with my friends skateing downtown miami when we took a break. there was this cop that we saw follow us from burger king to the next spot just cause he saw a familiar urban skateboarding sticker on our car. when we got out of the car to skate he arrested two of my friends who were skateing. he told us that he knew there was gonna be trouble when he saw that sticker. how gay is that
|
|
|
|
Hazardous Activity = "free from liability"???
|
On 1/10/2006 Pat Chewning
wrote in from
United States
(67.189.nnn.nnn)
This article has an overview of the new Florida law and its effect on liability insurance and risk exposure to a city building a skate park.
http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/0/fafeb77e0d5ba70185256c6200704a96?OpenDocument
The gist of the article is that the poorly written Florida law, combined with no real precedents (past lawsuits that have been brought to trial and conclusion)gives the "risk manager" of a city no real firm idea how protected the city may be. So, naturally, the "risk manager" errs on the side of less risk by purchasing insurance, and the insurance carrier insists on rules to help protect the company against lawsuits ..... leading to parks that aren't open very long, or don't go vert, etc...
Until some of these laws are tested and proven to hold up in court, the city managment will likely continue to insist on insurance.
So the best thing that could happen is for a number of skateboarders to get "injured" at the park, file lawsuits after hiring attorneys who are paid to loose by not challenging the state law, then these cases can set a precedent that the state law is "strong", and the city can forego insurance converage and the restrictive rules of the insurance carrier. Yep, that's going to happen! :)
Alternatively, the law could be strengthened into something with real meaning...
|
|
|
|
"Hazardous Activity" = free from liability?
|
On 1/10/2006
Lansing
wrote in from
United States
(70.146.nnn.nnn)
I just moved to Miami, and it is "tranny hell." The nearest 'crete bowls are at the Oeslner Y, 105 miles from my house (= 2.5 hour drive each way in Miami traffic). There is a pre-fab McSkate Park in Marathon (1 hr. away), and they just did a major upgrade and added a nice 6 foot wooden bowl. It's at the city park, and get this (you aren't gonna believe it): The city has set the skatepark hours from 3 to 5pm daily!! TWO friggin' hours! What an absolutely joke.
Wanna know why (I just got off the phone with the Parks & Rec department)? They say that their liability insurance company requires them to have adult supervision to enforce the pad rules, etc. or they won't be covered. That means they have to hire someone over the age of 18 to be present, and then you get into -- yup, you guessed it -- NO BUDGET. All they can afford is to hire someone for a couple of hours per day, as there is no budget for a full-time park employee to man the skatepark.
OK. Can you say LAME? Why the crap even build a bowl - or a skatepark at all - if you can't afford to have it open?
But here's my question and the real issue:
According to my understanding, many states (such as CA) had skateboarding legally declared as a "hazardous activity," which opened the way for cities to build public skateparks because they were then free from liability. Right? And according to what I've been told, cities actually OPEN themselves up to liability once they hire a Pad-Nanny to supervise the skatepark -- hence the fact that all the public/city skateparks I've ever been to in CA and MA are unmanned and open dawn-to-dusk.
So I did some research, and found out that Florida also just declared skateboarding a "hazardous activity" in 2005 (state statute 316.0085 under title XXII).
Doesn't this mean that the city is NO LONGER liable as long as they post the rules (i.e. "skateboarding is dangerous, so wear pads and don't do something stoopid.")? That's the way it works in CA and MA, at least. If some kid breaks his arm or dies, Mom & Dad can't sue the city for $10,000,000 because skateboarding is defined as a hazardous activity, and the park was NOT monitered.
I then found out that there are other public skateparks in Florida that are *unsupervised* and open dawn-to-dusk.
So I call the Parks & Rec dept. back and share all this information. Well, you can imagine the response I got. Not very friendly. "Well sir, we are required to have liability insurance, and the insurance company has informed us that there needs to be a hired adult present to monitor the skatepark and enforce the regulations."
To which I reply "Um...well, not to be rude, but there are hundreds and hundreds of public skateparks on city property all over the country, which are unsupervised and open all day. Perhaps there is a wee bit of 'conflict of interest', and instead of listening to the insurance company you could consult with a city lawyer? Of course a insurance company is going to tell the city to hire someone to enforce the rules, and in fact the fewer hours the skatepark is open, the better in their eyes. And perhaps they -- and your Parks & Rec manager -- are not even familiar with the new statute declaring skateboarding a hazardous activity under Florida law."
Again -- Not a happy reply. "Well, sir, I'm happy to pass this information along to (get this) our INSURANCE company and see what they say."
Um - Did you not hear what I said, lady? I even gave her the statute # and told her that I would be happy to discuss it with a LAWYER for the city. No dice.
Advice???? Am I missing something here? Is there anywhere I can get more ammunition about the liabilities (or lack of) of cities in states where skateboarding is legally a hazardous activity?
Help!
Thanks, Lansing
|
|
|
|
skateboarding law
|
On 1/7/2006
Gurra
wrote in from
Sweden
(213.64.nnn.nnn)
it's a pity it has come to this in the US, it's totaly mad. i can't belive you get fines for skating on an ordinary road. something must be truely rotten. come to sweden and skate with us, you don't get tickets here, no one would ever dream about it. btw, i'm comin over to LA this summer to skate, surf and hang out. I'll probably be alone so if anyone wants to show me around, email me... hang loose cheers.
|
|
|
|
|